The Gross decision held age discrimination plaintiffs to a higher standard of proof than other victims of discrimination by requiring them to prove their age was the “but for” cause of the employer’s adverse decision instead of “a motivating factor.”
The legislation (H.R. 3721, S. 1756) establishes that:
- standards of proof for all federal laws forbidding discrimination and retaliation (including whistleblowing) are the same
- the plaintiff can choose the method of proof for the case
- employees can rely on any type or form of admissible circumstantial or direct evidence to prove their discrimination and retaliation cases
0 comments:
Post a Comment